Can we predict an incomplete capsule endoscopy? Results of a multivariate analysis using a logistic regression model

Background and aims: small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) does not reach the cecum within the battery lifetime in approximately 15-35 % of patients. Incomplete examinations result in diagnostic delays and increase the economic burden. To date, risk factors for incomplete examinations have been described with contradictory results. The aims of this study were to analyze the rate and identify risk factors for incomplete examinations, excluding capsule retentions, in a large cohort of patients.Methods: data from 1,894 consecutive SBCE examinations performed from January 2009 to December 2015 were analyzed. Variables recorded included demographics, past medical and surgical history, biochemical parameters and procedure characteristics. The rate of incomplete examinations, excluding capsule retentions, was calculated and a multivariate analysis using a logistic regression model was performed in order to evaluate predictive factors.Results: the incidence of incomplete examinations, excluding capsule retentions, was 10.1 % (187 incomplete procedures). The multivariate analysis showed that age > 65 years, gastric transit time > 41 minutes and SB transit time > 286 minutes are predictive factors for incomplete examinations, increasing the probability of this event by 199 % (OR: 1.99; 95 % CI: 1.34-2.95), 260 % (OR: 2.60; 95 % CI: 1.72-3.93) and 352 % (OR: 3.52; 95 % CI: 2.26-5.48), respectively.Conclusions: age > 65 years, gastric transit time > 41 minutes and SB transit time > 286 minutes are predictive factors for incomplete examinations excluding capsule retentions. Both age and gastric transit time events are known before the procedure ends. Therefore, pharmacologic or endoscopic measures may be taken into account to avoid incomplete examinations. (AU)

Can we predict an incomplete capsule endoscopy? Results of a multivariate analysis using a logistic regression model.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) does not reach the cecum within the battery lifetime in approximately 15-35 % of patients. Incomplete examinations result in diagnostic delays and increase the economic burden. To date, risk factors for incomplete examinations have been described with contradictory results. The aims of this study were to analyze the rate and identify risk factors for incomplete examinations, excluding capsule retentions, in a large cohort of patients. METHODS: data from 1,894 consecutive SBCE examinations performed from January 2009 to December 2015 were analyzed. Variables recorded included demographics, past medical and surgical history, biochemical parameters and procedure characteristics. The rate of incomplete examinations, excluding capsule retentions, was calculated and a multivariate analysis using a logistic regression model was performed in order to evaluate predictive factors. RESULTS: the incidence of incomplete examinations, excluding capsule retentions, was 10.1 % (187 incomplete procedures). The multivariate analysis showed that age > 65 years, gastric transit time > 41 minutes and SB transit time > 286 minutes are predictive factors for incomplete examinations, increasing the probability of this event by 199 % (OR: 1.99; 95 % CI: 1.34-2.95), 260 % (OR: 2.60; 95 % CI: 1.72-3.93) and 352 % (OR: 3.52; 95 % CI: 2.26-5.48), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: age > 65 years, gastric transit time > 41 minutes and SB transit time > 286 minutes are predictive factors for incomplete examinations excluding capsule retentions. Both age and gastric transit time events are known before the procedure ends. Therefore, pharmacologic or endoscopic measures may be taken into account to avoid incomplete examinations.

Oral ingestion versus endoscopic delivery of endoscopic capsule in patients with previous gastrointestinal surgery (ORENCES study): A Spanish multicentre observational study / Ingesta oral versus colocación endoscópica de la cápsula endoscópica en pacientes con cirugía gastrointestinal previa (estudio ORENCES): un estudio observacional multicéntrico español

Background: Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy is the first-choice technique for investigating the majority of small bowel diseases. Its most common complications are related to incomplete examinations and capsule retention. There is no consensus on how patients with previous gastrointestinal surgery should receive the capsule. Objective: The primary endpoint was to compare the rate of complete small-bowel examinations (completion rate) between oral ingestion and endoscopic delivery of the capsule. The secondary endpoint was to compare diagnostic yield and adverse events in the two groups. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted in nine hospitals in Spain. Demographic data, previous surgery, indication for capsule endoscopy, intestinal transit time, diagnosis, completion rate (percentage of capsules reaching the caecum), diagnostic yield (percentage of results compatible with indication for the exam) and adverse events were collected. Results: From January 2009 to May 2019 fifty-seven patients were included (39 male, mean age 66±15 years). The most common indications for the exam were “overt” (50.9%) and “occult” (35.1%) small bowel bleeding. Previous Billroth II gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass were present in 52.6% and 17.5% of patients respectively. The capsule was swallowed in 34 patients and placed endoscopically in 23 patients. No significant differences were observed between the oral ingestion and endoscopic delivery groups in terms of completion rate (82.4% vs. 78.3%; p=0.742), diagnostic yield (41.2% vs. 52.2%; p=0.432) or small bowel transit time (301 vs. 377min, p=0.118). No capsule retention occurred. Only one severe adverse event (anastomotic perforation) was observed in the endoscopic delivery group. Conclusions: In our case series, there were no significant differences between oral ingestion and endoscopic delivery in terms of completion rate, diagnostic yield or safety.(AU)

Antecedentes: La cápsula endoscópica representa la técnica de primera elección para investigar la mayoría de las enfermedades del intestino delgado. Sus complicaciones más comunes frecuentes son las exploraciones incompletas y la retención a nivel de intestino delgado. Hasta el momento no hay acuerdo sobre cómo administrar la cápsula a los pacientes que han sido sometidos a una cirugía gastrointestinal previa. Objetivo: El objetivo principal fue comparar la tasa de estudios completos entre la ingestión oral y la administración endoscópica de la cápsula. Los objetivos secundarios fueron comparar el rendimiento diagnóstico y los eventos adversos en ambos grupos. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional retrospectivo en 9 hospitales de España. Se recogieron datos demográficos, cirugía previa, indicación de cápsula endoscópica, tiempo de tránsito intestinal, diagnóstico, tasa de estudios completos (porcentaje de cápsulas que llegan al ciego), rendimiento diagnóstico (porcentaje de resultados compatibles con la indicación del examen) y eventos adversos. Resultados: Desde enero de 2009 hasta mayo de 2019 se incluyeron 57 pacientes (39 hombres, edad media 66 ± 15 años). Las indicaciones más frecuentes para el examen fueron hemorragia de intestino delgado «manifiesta» (50,9%) y «oculta» (35,1%). El 52,6% de los pacientes presentaba gastrectomía Billroth II y el 17,5% bypass gástrico en Y de Roux. La cápsula fue ingerida en 34 pacientes y colocada endoscópicamente en 23 pacientes. No se observaron diferencias significativas entre los grupos de ingesta oral y de colocación endoscópica en cuanto a tasa de estudios completos (82,4% vs. 78,3%; p = 0,742), rendimiento diagnóstico (41,2% vs. 52,2%; p = 0,432) y tiempo de tránsito del intestino delgado (301 vs. 377 min, p = 0,118). No hubo casos de cápsulas retenidas. Solo se observó un evento adverso severo (perforación anastomótica) en el grupo de colocación endoscópica...(AU)

Uso de la cápsula endoscópica en enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal en práctica clínica en España. Resultados de una encuesta nacional / Use of capsule endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease in clinical practice in Spain. Results from a national survey

Introducción: La cápsula endoscópica de intestino delgado (CEID) es una técnica diagnóstica poco invasiva cuyo empleo en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) se ha extendido. Se ha desarrollado recientemente una cápsula panentérica, PillCamCrohn's (PCC). Carecemos de información sobre la disponibilidad y el uso de la CEID y la PCC en nuestro medio. Métodos: Realizamos una encuesta electrónica y anónima entre los miembros del Grupo Español de Trabajo en Enfermedad de Crohn y Colitis Ulcerosa y la Asociación Española de Gastroenterología consistente en 37 preguntas de respuesta múltiple. Resultados: Participaron 150 miembros, la mayoría con dedicación especial a la EII (69,3%). El 72,8% trabajaban en centros con unidad de EII. El 79% tenían la CEID disponible en su hospital, y el 14% la derivaban a otro centro. El 22% tenían disponible la PCC, y el 9% la derivaban a otro centro. El 79,3% de encuestados con CEID disponible la utilizaban en un pequeño porcentaje de pacientes con EII y el 15,6% en la mayoría. Los escenarios más frecuentes fueron la sospecha de enfermedad de Crohn (76,3%), la valoración de actividad inflamatoria (54,7%) y la evaluación de la extensión de la enfermedad (54,7%). Más de la mitad (59,7%) utilizaban preferentemente la cápsula Patency® para valoración de la permeabilidad intestinal. Casi todos los encuestados (99,3%) consideraban que se deberían implementar recursos formativos en esta técnica. Conclusiones: La CEID cuenta con una amplia disponibilidad en los hospitales españoles para el manejo de la EII, si bien su uso es todavía limitado. Existe una oportunidad para aumentar la formación en esta técnica, y, con ella, su empleo.(AU)

Introduction: Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is a non-invasive diagnostic technique whose use in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has spread. A panenteric capsule, PillCam Crohn's (PCC), has recently been developed. We lack information on the availability and use of the CEID and PCC in our environment. Methods: We conducted an electronic and anonymous survey among the members of the Grupo Español de Trabajo en Enfermedad de Crohn y Colitis Ulcerosa (GETECCU) [Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis] and the Asociación Española de Gastroenterología (AEG) [Spanish Association of Gastroenterology], consisting of 37 multiple-choice questions. Results: One hundred and fifty members participated, the majority dedicated to IBD (69.3%). 72.8% worked at centres with an IBD unit. 79% had SBCE available at their hospital, 14% referred patients to another centre; 22% had a PCC available, 9% referred patients to another centre. 79.3% of respondents with available SBCE used it in a small percentage of patients with IBD and 15.6% in the majority. The most frequent scenarios were suspicion of Crohn's disease (76.3%), assessment of inflammatory activity (54.7%) and assessment of the extent of the disease (54.7%). More than half (59.7%) preferentially used the Patency capsule to assess intestinal patency. Almost all respondents (99.3%) considered that training resources should be implemented in this technique. Conclusions: SBCE is widely available in Spanish hospitals for the management of IBD, although its use is still limited. There is an opportunity to increase training in this technique, and consequently its use.(AU)

Prognostic factors associated with unhealed perineal wounds post-proctectomy for perianal Crohn's disease: a two-centre study.

AIM: The aim of this work was to determine the factors associated with poor wound healing in patients with perianal Crohn's disease (pCD) who had undergone proctectomy in the era of biologic therapies. METHOD: Case record review was performed on 103 patients with pCD who underwent proctectomy at St Mark's Hospital, Harrow and the Western General Hospital, Edinburgh between 2005 and 2017. Healing rates at 6 and 12 months post-proctectomy were considered; univariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: Sixty out of 103 patients (58.3%) had failure of wound healing at 6 months and 41/103 (39.8%) at 12 months. In total, 63.1% (65/103) patients received biologic therapies prior to proctectomy; however, exposure to biologics was not a significant factor in predicting failure of wound healing at 12 months (infliximab p = 0.255; adalimumab p = 0.889; vedolizumab p = 0.153). Male gender was the only variable associated with poor wound healing at 12 months on univariate analysis (p = 0.017). A lower pre-operative C-reactive protein was associated with early wound healing at 6 months compared with at 12 months (p = 0.041) on univariate analysis. Other parameters not associated with rates of wound healing included smoking status, corticosteroid exposure, thiopurine exposure, number of previous biologics, perianal sepsis on MRI within the last 12 months, duration of CD prior to proctectomy and pre-operative albumin. CONCLUSION: More than a third of patients had unhealed wounds 12 months after proctectomy. We report that unhealed wounds are more common in male patients. Importantly, our results also suggest that exposure to biologics does not affect rates of wound healing.

Use of capsule endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease in clinical practice in Spain. Results from a national survey. / Uso de la cápsula endoscópica en enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal en práctica clínica en España. Resultados de una encuesta nacional.

INTRODUCTION: Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is a non-invasive diagnostic technique whose use in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has spread. A panenteric capsule, PillCam Crohn's (PCC), has recently been developed. We lack information on the availability and use of the CEID and PCC in our environment. METHODS: We conducted an electronic and anonymous survey among the members of the Grupo Español de Trabajo en Enfermedad de Crohn y Colitis Ulcerosa (GETECCU) [Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis] and the Asociación Española de Gastroenterología (AEG) [Spanish Association of Gastroenterology], consisting of 37 multiple-choice questions. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty members participated, the majority dedicated to IBD (69.3%). 72.8% worked at centres with an IBD unit. 79% had SBCE available at their hospital, 14% referred patients to another centre; 22% had a PCC available, 9% referred patients to another centre. 79.3% of respondents with available SBCE used it in a small percentage of patients with IBD and 15.6% in the majority. The most frequent scenarios were suspicion of Crohn's disease (76.3%), assessment of inflammatory activity (54.7%) and assessment of the extent of the disease (54.7%). More than half (59.7%) preferentially used the Patency capsule to assess intestinal patency. Almost all respondents (99.3%) considered that training resources should be implemented in this technique. CONCLUSIONS: SBCE is widely available in Spanish hospitals for the management of IBD, although its use is still limited. There is an opportunity to increase training in this technique, and consequently its use.

Gastroenterologists' attitudes on the detection and management of gastric premalignant conditions: results of a nationwide survey in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: Gastric premalignant conditions (GPC) surveillance has been proposed to improve the prognosis of gastric cancer (GC), but the early GC detection rate remaining low, and missing GC during an esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy is still a problem. We aimed to explore the gastroenterologists' attitudes on the detection and management of GPC. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was designed based on a survey among gastroenterologists from Asociación Española de Gastroenterología. RESULTS: The participation rate was 12% (146/1243). Eighty-one percent worked at secondary or tertiary-care hospitals with the capability to perform mucosectomy (80%), but with a lesser availability of endoscopic submucosal dissection (35%). Most respondents had high-definition endoscopes (88%), and virtual chromoendoscopy (86%), but during performing an upper endoscopy, 34% never or rarely use chromoendoscopy, and 73% apply a biopsy protocol often/very often when atrophy or intestinal metaplasia (IM) is suspected. Half of the respondents self-reported their ability to recognize atrophy or IM ≤7 (on a scale from 0 to 10), whereas ≤6 for dysplasia or early GC. Helicobacter pylori infection is eradicated and verified by ≥90%. Endoscopic surveillance of atrophy/IM is performed by 62%. An immediate endoscopy for dysplasia is not always performed. For low-grade dysplasia, 97.6% consider endoscopic management, but for high-grade dysplasia, 23% regard gastric surgery. CONCLUSION: There is a wide variability in the detection and management of GPC among Spanish gastroenterologists, and compliance with guidelines and biopsy protocols could be improved. Performance of high-quality gastroscopies including use of virtual chromoendoscopy, that might allow an improvement in the GPC detection, needs also to be generalized.

Ustekinumab en enfermedad de Crohn: efectividad y seguridad en práctica clínica / Ustekinumab in Crohn's disease: effectiveness and safety in clinical practice

INTRODUCCIÓN: Ustekinumab (UST) es un anticuerpo monoclonal frente a IL-12/23 aprobado en España (2017) para tratar el brote moderado/grave de enfermedad de Crohn. OBJETIVO: Evaluar la efectividad y seguridad en práctica clínica real en los pacientes tratados con UST en nuestro centro. MÉTODOS: Estudio prospectivo observacional unicéntrico incluyendo los pacientes que iniciaron UST desde el 1/08/2017 hasta el 28/02/2019 con seguimiento hasta esa fecha. Analizamos respuesta y remisión en semanas 16, 24 y 52, utilizando «Crohn's Disease Activity Index» (respuesta si descenso de 100 puntos y remisión si <150) y la «Valoración Global del especialista» traducción del «Physician's Global Assessment». RESULTADOS: Incluimos 61 pacientes con una mediana de duración de enfermedad de Crohn de 14,6 años (0-36). El 83,6% sin esteroides y el 73,8% sin inmunosupresores asociados. Previamente todos habían recibido anti-TNF y el 14,8%, además, vedolizumab. Observamos buena correlación entre Crohn's Disease Activity Index y Valoración Global del especialista (r = 0,89, p < 0,001). En la semana 16 (n = 45) un 75,6% de respuesta (57,8% remisión), en semana 24 (n = 35) 69,9% respuesta (45,7% remisión) y en semana 52 (n = 12) 75% respuesta (58,3% remisión). No se obtuvieron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la tasa de respuesta/remisión en semana 16 ni 24 en función del motivo de inicio de UST o el número de biológicos previos. En 2 pacientes se retiró por toxicidad (artralgias/mialgias). CONCLUSIÓN: UST es un fármaco eficaz y seguro en práctica clínica real con altas tasas de remisión clínica en semana 16, 24 y 52 independientemente del orden de biológico utilizado y del motivo de inicio de UST

INTRODUCTION: Ustekinumab (UST) is a monoclonal antibody against IL-12/23 approved in Spain (2017) to treat moderate / severe Crohn's disease. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety in real clinical practice in patients treated with UST in our center. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study including patients who started UST from 08/01/2017 to 02/28/2019 with follow-up up to that date. We analyze response and remission in weeks 16, 24 and 52, using "Crohn's Disease Activity Index" (response if 100 point decrease and remission if <150) and Physician's Global Assessment. RESULTS: We included 61 patients with a median duration of Crohn's disease of 14,6 years (0-36). The 83,6% of patients without steroids and 73,8% without associated immunosuppressors. Previously all patients had received anti-TNF and 14,8%, in addition, vedolizumab. We observed a good correlation between Crohn's Disease Activity Index and Physician's Global Assessment (r = 0,89, p <.001). In week 16 (n = 45) 75,6% response (57,8% remission), in week 24 (n = 35) 69,9% response (45,7% remission) and in week 52 (n = 12) 75% response (58.3% remission). There were no statistically significant differences in the response/remission rates at week 16 or 24 depending on the reason for the onset of UST or the number of previous biologics. In 2 patients it was withdrawn due to toxicity (arthralgia / myalgia). CONCLUSION: UST is an effective and safe treatment in real clinical practice with high rates of clinical remission at week 16, 24 and 52 regardless of the order of biological used and the reason for starting UST

Ustekinumab in Crohn's disease: effectiveness and safety in clinical practice. / Ustekinumab en enfermedad de Crohn: efectividad y seguridad en práctica clínica.

INTRODUCTION: Ustekinumab (UST) is a monoclonal antibody against IL-12/23 approved in Spain (2017) to treat moderate / severe Crohn's disease. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety in real clinical practice in patients treated with UST in our center. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study including patients who started UST from 08/01/2017 to 02/28/2019 with follow-up up to that date. We analyze response and remission in weeks 16, 24 and 52, using "Crohn's Disease Activity Index" (response if 100 point decrease and remission if <150) and Physician's Global Assessment. RESULTS: We included 61 patients with a median duration of Crohn's disease of 14,6 years (0-36). The 83,6% of patients without steroids and 73,8% without associated immunosuppressors. Previously all patients had received anti-TNF and 14,8%, in addition, vedolizumab. We observed a good correlation between Crohn's Disease Activity Index and Physician's Global Assessment (r = 0,89, p <.001). In week 16 (n = 45) 75,6% response (57,8% remission), in week 24 (n = 35) 69,9% response (45,7% remission) and in week 52 (n = 12) 75% response (58.3% remission). There were no statistically significant differences in the response/remission rates at week 16 or 24 depending on the reason for the onset of UST or the number of previous biologics. In 2 patients it was withdrawn due to toxicity (arthralgia / myalgia). CONCLUSION: UST is an effective and safe treatment in real clinical practice with high rates of clinical remission at week 16, 24 and 52 regardless of the order of biological used and the reason for starting UST.

Utilidad clínica de la determinación de niveles de CT-P13, biosimilar de infliximab, en el control de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal / Clinical value of CT-P13 trough levels, an infliximab biosimilar, in the management of inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCCIÓN: CT-P13 es un fármaco biosimilar de infliximab (IFX), efectivo en pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII). La medición de niveles de IFX y anticuerpos anti-IFX forma parte del tratamiento integral de dicha enfermedad. OBJETIVO: Comparar la respuesta clínica en función de un abordaje estrictamente clínico (CLN) o proactivo (PRO) basado en la medición de niveles en la semana 14, en la práctica clínica. MÉTODOS: Estudio prospectivo en pacientes que inician CT-P13 por EII. En el grupo PRO se midieron sistemáticamente los niveles de IFX y de anticuerpos postinducción (semana 14) y se intensificaron aquellos con niveles infraterapéuticos (<3μg/ml), independientemente de la respuesta clínica. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 77 pacientes (23 colitis ulcerosa y 54 enfermedad de Crohn). Ambos grupos, PRO (n=41) y CLN (n=36) presentaron una eficacia inicial y a largo plazo sin diferencias significativas. En la semana 14 hubo un 61% de remisión clínica (RC) (58,5% PRO, 63,9% CLN) y un 80,5% de al menos respuesta parcial (RP) (80,5% PRO, 80,6% CLN). En la semana 54 hubo un 68,8% de RC (61% PRO, 77,8% CLN) y un 76,6% de al menos RP (73,2% PRO, 80,6% CLN). De los pacientes en RC en la semana 14 (24 PRO, 23 CLN), 13 del grupo PRO fueron intensificados por niveles infraterapéuticos. En este subgrupo no se observaron diferencias significativas en la pérdida de respuesta secundaria (PRO 0%, CLN 8,7%). CONCLUSIÓN: Un manejo proactivo no mejoró las tasas de respuesta ni la remisión en el primer año. La intensificación de pacientes en RC y niveles infraterapéuticos postinducción no parece prevenir de forma significativa la pérdida de respuesta secundaria en el primer año

INTRODUCTION: CT-P13 is a biosimilar drug of infliximab (IFX), effective in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The monitoring of levels of IFX and anti-IFX antibodies is now considered part of the integral management. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical response according to a strictly clinical (CLN) or proactive (PRO) approach based on the monitoring of levels in week 14, in clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in IBD patients starting CT-P13. In the PRO group, levels of IFX and post-induction antibodies were systematically measured (week 14) and those with infraterapeutic levels (<3μg/ml) were intensified, irrespective of the clinical response. RESULTS: We included 77 patients (23 ulcerative colitis and 54 Crohn's disease). Both PRO (n=41) and CLN (n=36) groups showed initial and long-term efficacy without significant differences. At week 14, 61% clinical remission (CR) (58.5% PRO, 63.9% CLN) and 80.5% at least partial response (PR) (80.5% PRO, 80.6% CLN). In week 54, 68.8% CR (61% PRO, 77.8% CLN) and 76.6% at least PR (73.2% PRO, 80.6% CLN). Of the patients in CR in week 14 (24 PRO, 23 CLN), 13 of the PRO group were intensified due to infra-therapeutic levels. In this subgroup no significant differences were observed in secondary loss of response (PRO 0%, CLN 8.7%). CONCLUSION: Proactive management does not improve response or remission rates in the first year. The intensification of clinical remission patients with post-induction infratherapeutic levels does not seem to significantly prevent secondary loss of response in the first year

Capsule endoscopy, a useful tool for the diagnosis of a tapeworm infection

No disponible

Clinical value of CT-P13 trough levels, an infliximab biosimilar, in the management of inflammatory bowel disease. / Utilidad clínica de la determinación de niveles de CT-P13, biosimilar de infliximab, en el control de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.

INTRODUCTION: CT-P13 is a biosimilar drug of infliximab (IFX), effective in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The monitoring of levels of IFX and anti-IFX antibodies is now considered part of the integral management. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical response according to a strictly clinical (CLN) or proactive (PRO) approach based on the monitoring of levels in week 14, in clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in IBD patients starting CT-P13. In the PRO group, levels of IFX and post-induction antibodies were systematically measured (week 14) and those with infraterapeutic levels (<3µg/ml) were intensified, irrespective of the clinical response. RESULTS: We included 77 patients (23 ulcerative colitis and 54 Crohn's disease). Both PRO (n=41) and CLN (n=36) groups showed initial and long-term efficacy without significant differences. At week 14, 61% clinical remission (CR) (58.5% PRO, 63.9% CLN) and 80.5% at least partial response (PR) (80.5% PRO, 80.6% CLN). In week 54, 68.8% CR (61% PRO, 77.8% CLN) and 76.6% at least PR (73.2% PRO, 80.6% CLN). Of the patients in CR in week 14 (24 PRO, 23 CLN), 13 of the PRO group were intensified due to infra-therapeutic levels. In this subgroup no significant differences were observed in secondary loss of response (PRO 0%, CLN 8.7%). CONCLUSION: Proactive management does not improve response or remission rates in the first year. The intensification of clinical remission patients with post-induction infratherapeutic levels does not seem to significantly prevent secondary loss of response in the first year.

Clinical validation of risk scoring systems to predict risk of delayed bleeding after EMR of large colorectal lesions.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Endoscopic Resection Group of the Spanish Society of Endoscopy (GSEED-RE) model and the Australian Colonic Endoscopic Resection (ACER) model were proposed to predict delayed bleeding (DB) after EMR of large superficial colorectal lesions, but neither has been validated. We validated and updated these models. METHODS: A multicenter cohort study was performed in patients with nonpedunculated lesions ≥20 mm removed by EMR. We assessed the discrimination and calibration of the GSEED-RE and ACER models. Difficulty performing EMR was subjectively categorized as low, medium, or high. We created a new model, including factors associated with DB in 3 cohort studies. RESULTS: DB occurred in 45 of 1034 EMRs (4.5%); it was associated with proximal location (odds ratio [OR], 2.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-6.16), antiplatelet agents (OR, 2.51; 95% CI, .99-6.34) or anticoagulants (OR, 4.54; 95% CI, 2.14-9.63), difficulty of EMR (OR, 3.23; 95% CI, 1.41-7.40), and comorbidity (OR, 2.11; 95% CI, .99-4.47). The GSEED-RE and ACER models did not accurately predict DB. Re-estimation and recalibration yielded acceptable results (GSEED-RE area under the curve [AUC], .64 [95% CI, .54-.74]; ACER AUC, .65 [95% CI, .57-.73]). We used lesion size, proximal location, comorbidity, and antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy to generate a new model, the GSEED-RE2, which achieved higher AUC values (.69-.73; 95% CI, .59-.80) and exhibited lower susceptibility to changes among datasets. CONCLUSIONS: The updated GSEED-RE and ACER models achieved acceptable prediction levels of DB. The GSEED-RE2 model may achieve better prediction results and could be used to guide the management of patients after validation by other external groups. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03050333.).

Capsule endoscopy, a useful tool for the diagnosis of a tapeworm infection.

The incidence of parasitic infections is rising in developed countries and its diagnosis might be challenging. We present the case of a woman diagnosed with a tapeworm infection by capsule endsocopy. Capsule endoscopy may have a role when the microscopic stool examination is negative in patients with non-specific symptoms.

Use of patency capsule in daily practice

No disponible

Use of patency capsule in daily practice.

We read with great interest the paper by Albuquerque et al. entitled "Predictive factors of small bowel patency in Crohn's disease patients". Despite being a safe procedure, capsule endoscopy (CE) retention is a complication that should be kept in mind, especially in Crohn's disease (CD) patients. However, the risk of CE retention can be minimized using the patency capsule (PC). Although some clinical trials confirm its effectiveness, its use in daily practice has been poorly investigated. Albuquerque et al. report a PC negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% in this setting.

Linfoma de Burkitt gástrico: una entidad infrecuente / Gastric Burkitt's lymphoma: A rare entity

No disponible

Gastroduodenal lesions detected during small bowel capsule endoscopy: incidence, diagnostic and therapeutic impact

Background: Capsule endoscopy was primarily designed for the investigation of the small bowel. However, it may also identify lesions in other segments of the gastrointestinal tract. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the incidence of gastroduodenal abnormalities during small bowel capsule endoscopy and its impact on patient diagnosis and management. Patients and methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of data from 2,217 consecutive capsule endoscopy procedures performed at a single tertiary-care center between January 2008 and February 2016. Patient baseline characteristics, gastroduodenal lesions, diagnosis and management before and after capsule endoscopy were recorded and a descriptive analysis was performed. Results: Two thousands and two hundred seventeen patients were finally included in the analysis. One thousand and seventy patients were male (48.2%) and the mean age was 56.1 ± 19.5 years (range: 12-93). Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (52.3%) and inflammatory bowel disease (18.3%) were the main procedure indications. Gastroduodenal abnormalities were detected by capsule endoscopy in 696 (31.4%) of 2,217 patients. The most common types of missed gastric and duodenal lesions found were gastric erosions (35.4%), findings suggestive of chronic gastritis (22.9%), duodenal erosions (28.1%) and duodenal erythema (23.5%). This information had a clinical or diagnostic impact of 26.2% and a therapeutic impact of 15.5%. Conclusion: Capsule endoscopy detects not only small bowel lesions but also some gastroduodenal lesions that may be overlooked during an initial gastroscopy. Therefore, all gastroduodenal images should be read during small bowel capsule endoscopy as it may provide relevant information that result in changes in patient management (AU)

No disponible